qiihoskeh: myo: kanji (Default)
qiihoskeh ([personal profile] qiihoskeh) wrote2005-09-08 08:32 am
Entry tags:

Time-related Morphology

I came up with some more ideas on filling in the details for time-related morphology in Neimulis.

The proposal is to:

  1. use <jitka> {jtQ} as the word for "what time" or "when", which will usually show up as <ejitka>. <jitka> is derived from <ji> {j} + <tutka> {ttQ}; this leads to
  2. using <ji> {j} as the "anaphoric" temporal point of reference marker. Also,
  3. use <ta> {T} as the "absolute" temporal point of reference marker, even if this is already used in making perfects indefinite (see my previous tag/neimulis entry).

The question now is the placement of these markers. I find that putting them immediately before the tense/mood suffix is easy to pronounce. This also solves the possible conflict in the uses of <ta> because

  1. when a tense/mood suffix appears, the relative position of the suffixes resolves which marker is intended, and
  2. the aspects not having to take tense/mood suffixes excludes the perfective, so the existing usage can't occur with them.

Some examples:
Jaanuu swinof du tokuba ejitka? {jOn: seNf d TqB EjtQ.} "When did John lift the tree?"
Qii feqdof du bohtu neosaele'toftafe-q. [i: ViDf d But YOSEL'TfTV-i.} "I saw the person who has never to this day sung for me." (Note the regular phonetic shift from <ta> to <to> in the romanization.)
Jaanuu hoskec du bohtu 'saeleta. {jOn: UsKc d But SEL-T.} "John will hear the person now singing."

No examples for the "anaphoric" temporal, which is less common.
I forgot to mention that <ta> {T} has a 3rd usage (the oldest one actually): marking transient present tense on nominoids. There's no conflict provided on knows what kind of word the suffix appears on.

Specifically, temporal points of reference are involved.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting