2006-Dec-21, Thursday

Polysynthetic Notes

2006-Dec-21, Thursday 14:01
qiihoskeh: myo: kanji (Default)
Last Edited: 2006.Dec.23 Sat

I'm probably scrapping the current affix system of the polysynthetic conlang. I'm working on a new system. The current system uses suffixes for all arguments and distinguishes extended plurals from limited plurals. The new system moves the first argument to prefix position (nounstems will use prefixes for possessors and determiners; the possessors will have the same origin as the first argument prefixes) and distinguishes only singular and plural number. It still uses a direct/inverse system (nounstems will use a different inverse marker, probably a suffix). It now uses a suffix to distinguish adverbial and adjectival forms from verbal forms. These preempt the second argument except that (a) for monovalent verbstems and reflexive divalent verbstems, the first argument is preempted and (b) there's a second adjectival suffix that preempts the third argument instead (I should note that the third argument represents the direct or secondary object). Oh, and the current umlaut system is also out too.

So far, so good; but I'm having trouble, as usual, with assigning sounds to the affixes that sound right.
Read more... )
There are fewer combinations of affixes, which simplifies the documentation: only
1st argument * grammatical voice (32 prefix combinations),
3rd argument * 2nd argument (15 suffix combinations),
part of speech * 2nd argument (5 suffix combinations), and
part of speech * 3rd argument (6 suffix combinations).
This is really a lot simpler than the current system.

Profile

qiihoskeh: myo: kanji (Default)
qiihoskeh

November 2017

M T W T F S S
  12345
6789101112
1314 1516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 2025-Jul-25, Friday 17:56
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios